Legal Opinion
Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. Wilcox
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 4, 1926No. Docket No. 22PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.
This is a suit to recover a drain assessment for benefits, paid under protest. The facts are stipulated and show the assessment was not for claimed benefits from a local improvement in a city or village but out in the country. Plaintiff claims exemption by virtue of section 4001, 1 Comp. Laws 1915, which provides:
“The following real property shall be exempt from taxation: * * *
“Eighth, The real property of corporations exempt under the laws of this State, by reason of paying specific taxes in lieu of all other taxes for support of the State: Provided, That the track, right of way, depot…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Robertson v. BaxterMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. AshleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by2 opinions
- Muskegon Township v. Muskegon County Drain CommissionerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Squier v. NashMichigan Supreme Court · 1927