Legal Opinion

Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. Wilcox

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1926No. Docket No. 22PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

This is a suit to recover a drain assessment for benefits, paid under protest. The facts are stipulated and show the assessment was not for claimed benefits from a local improvement in a city or village but out in the country. Plaintiff claims exemption by virtue of section 4001, 1 Comp. Laws 1915, which provides:

“The following real property shall be exempt from taxation: * * *
“Eighth, The real property of corporations exempt under the laws of this State, by reason of paying specific taxes in lieu of all other taxes for support of the State: Provided, That the track, right of way, depot…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robertson v. BaxterMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. AshleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Muskegon Township v. Muskegon County Drain CommissionerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Squier v. NashMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API