Legal Opinion
Hefazi v. Stiglitz
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 2, 2004No. 03-CV-550PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge:
Appellants Samad Hefazi and Helga Metz-Hefazi (“the Hefazis” or “appellants”) 1 appeal from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee Michael Stiglitz (“Mr. Stiglitz” or “appellee”) in an easemenf/party wall property matter, and the denial of certain of their motions, including their motion to vacate the trial court’s summary judgment order. We affirm.
FACTUAL SUMMARY
The record on appeal shows that three properties in the Northwest quadrant of the District of Columbia — 2808 and 2805 Que Street, and 1600 28th Street — “were originally a single…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lynch v. Meridian Hill Studio Apts., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Joyner v. Sibley Memorial HospitalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Milton Properties, Inc. v. NewbyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Chaconas v. MeyersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Carrollsburg v. AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Campione v. SodenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- James Thomas Martin v. Noel L. BicknellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Sears v. Catholic Archdiocese of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Crawford v. KatzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- DLY-Adams Place, LLC v. Waste Manangement of MaryLand, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.