Legal Opinion
Carrollsburg v. Anderson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 14, 2002No. 00-CV-173PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge.
In Taylor v. Eureka Inv. Corp., 482 A.2d 354 (D.C.1984), we held that the owners of town house units in Carrollsburg Square, in the Southwest section of the District of Columbia (“Carrollsburg Square owners” or “appellees”), who maintained that they had a right to park without charge in an underground garage in the nearby Car-rollsburg high-rise apartment building condominium (“Carrollsburg Condominium”) due to a parking easement, “were entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” We stated that “[t]he covenant clearly does not suggest that the [grantors] granted the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mowbray v. Cameron County, TXCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Lewis v. YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Joe Boone and Mary Alice Boone v. Jerome Kurtz, Commissioner of Internal Revenue and David C. LoeselCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Carr v. RoseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Roaring Fork Club, L.P. v. St. Jude's Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Threatt v. WinstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Georgetown UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Hefazi v. StiglitzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- AMEC Civil LLC v. Mitsubishi International Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Alligood v. LaSaracinaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.