Legal Opinion
In Re Russell
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided October 12, 1971PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Oueiam:.
The Attorney General of New Jersey called the attention of this court to testimony taken before the State Grand Jury which suggested that certain conduct of respondent had been unethical, unprofessional and in violation of the Canons of Professional Ethics. We referred the matter to a Judge of the Superior Court, designated as a Master of this Court, to act as an Ethics Committee with all the powers conferred upon such a committee by B. 1:30 and directed that a statement of charges in lieu of complaint be prepared and served upon respondent in accordance with B. 1:20-2 (b).
In…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re MatteraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- In Re BlattSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re NigohosianSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- State v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Mussman's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
- Thomas Affinito v. Roy Hendricks Attorney General of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- In re RussellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.