Legal Opinion

North v. State ex rel. Pate

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1886No. 11,653PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Dearborn Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, C. J.

The first errors complained of here by appellants, the defendants below, arc the overruling of their demurrers to each of the two paragraphs of the relators’ information or complaint.

In the first paragraph of their information, the relators John M. Pate and Lester Lostutter informed the court below that each of them was a citizen of this State, and that each ©f them, in attending to his occupation and business, was obliged to travel the road hereinafter mentioned, and that each of them was a stockholder in the pretended corporation, hereinafter mentioned, by virtue of having paid benefits…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baker v. NeffIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Williamson v. Kokomo Building & Loan Fund AssociationIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Albert v. State ex rel. AtkinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Hasselman v. United States Mortgage Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carmel Natural Gas & Improvement Co. v. SmallIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. State ex rel. Bingham v. Home Brewing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Doty v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Wright v. LeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Palmer v. Logansport & Rock Creek Gravel Road Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API