Legal Opinion

Doty v. Patterson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1900No. 19,067PublishedCited by 23 opinions

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

— This action was brought by appellees against appellants for the dissolution of an alleged partnership, an accounting, and the appointment of a receiver to take charge óf and sell the property thereof, and to recover any deficiency necessary to pay its debts. Appellants’ demurrer for want of facts to the complaint was overruled. The cause was put at issue, and a special finding of facts made by the court, and conclusions of law stated thereon in favor of appellees. Appellants separately and severally excepted to each conclusion of law. Judgment was rendered in favor of appellees. The errors…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Finnegan v. NoerenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Crowder v. Town of SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Carmel Natural Gas & Improvement Co. v. SmallIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Bushnell v. Consolidated Ice Machine Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Mokelumne Hill Canal & Mining Co. v. WoodburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Harrill v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. Sun River Stock & Land Co. v. Montana Trust & Savings BankMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. First National Bank v. RockefellerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. Marion Bond Co. v. Mexican Coffee & Rubber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Fowler v. NewsomIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API