Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bingham v. Home Brewing Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1914No. 21,689PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Prom Superior Court of Marion County (76,123); Pliny W. Bartholomew, Judge. 'Information in quo warranto by the State of Indiana, on the relation of James Bingham, Attorney-General, against the Home Brewing Company of Indianapolis. Prom a judgment for defendant, the relator appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCox, C. J.

This was an information in one paragraph in the nature of quo warranto brought on the relation of the Attorney-General against appellee, a manufacturing corporation engaged in the brewing business. The information alleges that the appellee has persistently and openly abused and exceeded its corporate powers for ten years, (1) by engaging in the real estate business and owning real estate other than that necessary for its business; (2) by loaning money, advancing money to pay retail liquor license fees and defraying expenses incidental to the issuance of retail liquor licenses; (3) by acting…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Sanders v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Platter v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Reynolds v. State, ex rel. TitusIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Nealis v. DicksIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Dœring v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. State ex rel. Williams v. EllisIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Songer v. Civitas BankIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State Ex Rel. Spencer v. Criminal Court, Marion Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Shupe v. BELLIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API