Legal Opinion

Satterfield & Pontikes Construction, Inc. v. Irving Independent School District

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2006No. 04-0175PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Satterfield & Pontikes Construction, Inc. sued Irving Independent School District for breach of a contract to construct a new middle school, violations of the Prompt Pay Act, TEX. GOV’T CODE §§ 2251.001-.055, and quantum meruit The trial court sustained the District’s plea to the jurisdiction based on immunity from suit and dismissed the case, and a divided court of appeals affirmed. 123 S.W.3d 63, 65-68 (Tex.App. — Dallas 2004). Satter-field contends that the District’s immunity is waived by section 11.151(a) of the Education Code, which states:

The trustees of an independent school district…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tooke v. City of MexiaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Satterfield & Pontikes Construction, Inc. v. Irving Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Tooke v. City of MexiaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Clear Lake City Water Auth. v. FRIENDSWOOD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LTD., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  3. City of Houston v. Swinerton Builders, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  4. Channelview Independent School District v. A.R.C.I., Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  5. LAMESA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v. BooeTexas Supreme Court · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API