Legal Opinion

LAMESA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v. Booe

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 2007No. 05-0959PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

David Booe d/b/a Booe Roofing Co. sued Lamesa Independent School District, seeking to recover under breach of implied contract and quantum meruit theories. The trial court denied the District’s plea to the jurisdiction based on sovereign immunity, issuing four conclusions of law in support of the denial. The court of ap peals affirmed, 2005 WL 2090670, basing its decision entirely on the trial court’s first conclusion — that the District’s immunity is waived by section 11.151(a) of the Education Code, which provides that “[t]he trustees of an independent school district constitute a body…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tooke v. City of MexiaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Anderson v. GilbertTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Satterfield & Pontikes Construction, Inc. v. Irving Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 2006

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kirby Lake Development, Ltd. v. Clear Lake City Water AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Lamesa Independent School District v. Booe, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2008
  3. Donna Independent School District v. Gracia, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  4. Donna Independent School District v. Gracia, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  5. LLoyd Gilliam and Carolyn Gilliam, Martha Hollan, Robert Villareal and Kelly Villarreal, Chris Rosson and Stacy Rosson, Charles Murl Beard and Karen Beard, Beverly O'Brien, Jim Knapp, Michael Sanders and Raquel Sanders, Richard Lon and Priscilla Lon, D. v. Santa Fe Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API