Legal Opinion

Miller v. West Jersey & Seashore Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 22, 1908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On motion to vacate order permitting amendment of declaration.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court -was delivered by

Sway.ze, J.

After the decision of this court, reported in 42 Vroom 363, the plaintiff obtained from a justice of the *283court an ’order allowing him to amend his declaration so as to count upon negligence on the part of the defendant in failing to protect the plaintiff, a passenger, from the conduct of employes of another railroad who were using trucks upon the same station platform1. The original declaration counted upon negligence of defendant’s servants in using the freight trucks. The present motion is to vacate the order allowing the amendment.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lower v. SegalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  2. Vunk v. Raritan River RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
  3. Key v. PaulSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. Meyonberg v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  3. Meyonberg v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API