Legal Opinion

Vunk v. Raritan River Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On motion to enter judgment on an award of arbitrators.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Depue, J.

The plaintiff brought suit against the defendants in tort to recover damages for the destruction of grass, •trees, timber and fences upon a tract of land situate in the township of East Brunswick, in the county of Middlesex, by means of fire communicated by sparks from a locomotive •engine of the defendants, through the negligence of the defendants’ servants and agents. The declaration alleged that the plaintiff was seized and possessed of the said tract, and cthat the said grass, trees, timber and fences were his property. To this declaration…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Birmingham Gas Co. v. SanfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Estate of Eisen v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Zanzonico v. ZanzonicoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
  4. Muldrow v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Miller v. West Jersey & Seashore RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API