Key v. Paul
Supreme Court of New Jersey
In tort. On motion to vacate order denying motion to strike out pleas and to strike out said pleas as frivolous.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dixon, J.
During vacation the plaintiffs moved before Mr. Justice Ludlow for an order striking out the defendant’s pleas as frivolous, under section 314 of the Practice act. Gen. Stat., p. 2585. This motion being denied, a rule to that effect was entered, and the plaintiffs now move before the court for an order vacating the order of Mr. Justice Ludlow and striking out the pleas as frivolous.
The practice of moving in vacation before a single judge for orders incident to the progress of a cause is quite ancient, and is supported at common law because of…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Miller v. West Jersey & Seashore RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Garbett v. MountfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
- Hite v. DellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- State Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
- Dubelbeiss v. Town of West HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.