Legal Opinion
Paris v. County of Santa Clara
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 17, 1969No. Civ. 24897PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, P. J.
Plaintiffs R. A. Paris and Edith Paris appeal from a judgment entered in an inverse condemnation action in favor of defendants City of Santa Clara and County of Santa Clara, which action sought damages for the taking of a 15-foot strip of plaintiffs’ property for street widening purposes.
The facts are without dispute. On July 5, 1956, plaintiffs purchased a parcel of real property adjoining Stevens Creek Boulevard in Santa Clara. On January 9, 1939, a prior owner of the property in question had filed with defendant county a subdivision map containing an offer to dedicate for street purposes a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Duncanson-Harrelson Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Hidden Valley Municipal Water District v. Calleguas Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- City of Coronado v. San Diego Unified Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- County of Orange v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ratchford v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Wright v. CITY OF MORRO BAYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Wright v. City of Morro BayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Soroush-Azar v. Palmer CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013