Legal Opinion
Wright v. City of Morro Bay
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 7, 2006No. B176929PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERREN, J.
A.J. Wright and Dan Reddell (collectively Wright) allege they are the fee owners of a portion of a dedicated street abutting their property because the street was never opened or used for a public purpose. Wright appeals from a judgment of dismissal following an order sustaining respondent City of Morro Bay’s (City) demurrer to his first amended complaint without leave to amend. The face of the complaint shows that county accepted the offer of dedication and that no abandonment occurred. We affirm.
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The material facts are not in dispute.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Hendy v. LosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Niles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wright v. CITY OF MORRO BAYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006