Legal Opinion

Hilbert v. Roth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1959No. Appeal, 52PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice McBride,

Plaintiff, Richard P. Hilbert, was injured when his automobile was struck by another ear driven by Dale Rutz, who died as a result of the accident. At the time of the accident Rutz was unlawfully racing with the defendant Frederick Roth. Plaintiff sued the Rutz Estate for compensatory damages and Roth for both compensatory and punitive damages. The two cases were consolidated for trial. During the joint trial the trial judge felt that the awkwardness of the application of the dead man’s rule only to the Rutz case required withdrawal of a juror as to Roth. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Seither v. Philad. Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Fox v. Northern LibertiesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  4. Hackett v. HysonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1946
  5. Anstine v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Basista v. WeirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  3. Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Kirkbride v. Lisbon Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API