Legal Opinion

Burnet v. Guggenheim

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 6, 1933No. 283PublishedCited by 344 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cardozo

The question to be decided is whether deeds of trust made in 1917, with a reservation to the grantor of a power of revocation, became taxable as gifts under the Revenue Act of 1924 when in 1925 there was a change of the deeds by the cancellation of the power.

On June 28, 1917, the respondent, a resident of New York, executed in New Jersey two deeds of trust, one for the benefit of his son, and one for the benefit of his daughter. The trusts were to continue for ten years, during which period part of the income was to be paid to the beneficiary and part accumulated. At the end of the ten year…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by344 opinions

  1. Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Local 28 of the Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Burnet v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

339 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API