Burnet v. Wells
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cardozo
Income of a trust has been reckoned by the taxing officers of the Government as income to be attributed to *673the creator of the trust in so far as it has been applied to the maintenance of insurance on his life. Section 219 (h) of the Revenue Acts of 1924 and 1926 permits this to be done. The question is whether as applied to this case the acts are constitutional.
On December 30, 1922, the respondent, Frederick B. Wells, created three trusts, referred to in the record as numbers 1, 2 and 3, and on August 6, 1923, two additional ones, numbers 4 and 5, all five being irrevocable.
By trust number 1,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by340 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Commissioner v. TowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Crane v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
335 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.