Wall v. Bagby
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom the Jay Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
— The appellee insists that as the appellants join in. their assignment of errors they must fail unless the errors alleged are well assigned as to both, and under the settled rule it is our duty to sustain this contention, for the errors are not well assigned as to all who unite in the assignment. It is a rule of practice, essential to the orderly administration of the law, that all who join in a motion or pleading must show a right to the relief demanded. The rule applies to complaints, answers, demurrers, motions for new trials, and other matters of procedure. Again and again it has been…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Walker v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Orton v. TillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Tucker v. ConradIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Hochstedler v. HochstedlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Hinkle v. ShelleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carr v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Yeoman v. ShaefferIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Hubbard v. BellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Kempf v. Union Saving & Loan Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895