Hubbard v. Bell
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
Joseph Ei Bell sued Walter J. Hubbard, Nathan E. Mills and Norval W. Ferguson, and recovered judgment against all the defendants for fifty dollars. From this judgment at special term an appeal was taken to the court below in general term. There the defendant Hubbard separately assigned as error the overruling of his separate, demurrer to the complaint, and the defend*181ant Mills separately assigned that the complaint did nor, state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against him. There was no joint assignment of error and no separate assignment by the defendant Eerguson, who, in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Walker v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Tucker v. ConradIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Hochstedler v. HochstedlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Boyd v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Feeney v. MazelinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Supreme Council of the Catholic Benevolent Legion v. BoyleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Board of Commissioners v. FraserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Morey v. Terre Haute Traction & Light Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Advance Manufacturing Co. v. AuchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Booker v. KillionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.