Kempf v. Union Saving & Loan Ass'n
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
The judgment from which this appeal is prosecuted was rendered upon a bond, in which Kempf was principal and the other appellants were sureties. The appellants Hess, Ebricht and Meyer, answered separately each from the other.
The only error discussed by counsel for appellants is the following: ‘ ‘ Come now the appellants in the above entitled cause, Robert Kempf, Casper Hess, August Ebricht and Prederick A. Meyer, and assign for error herein, the following, to-wit:
1. The court at special term erred in sustaining the demurrer of the plaintiff to the fourth and sixth para*571graph of the separate…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arbuckle v. SwimIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Town of Ladoga v. LinnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Bower v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Wall v. BagbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kentucky & Indiana Cement Co. v. MorganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
- Booker v. KillionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902