Legal Opinion

United States v. Waldron

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 27, 1981No. 39,505; NCM 78 1382PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLETCHER, Judge:

Pursuant to Article 67(b)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 867(b)(2), the Judge Advocate General of the Navy has certified to us the following question:

WAS THE UNITED STATES NAVY COURT OF MILITARY REVIEW CORRECT, AS A MATTER OF LAW, IN SETTING ASIDE THE ACCUSED’S CONVICTION OF THE OFFENSE OF ASSAULT IN WHICH GRIEVOUS BODILY HARM WAS INTENTIONALLY INFLICTED AND DISMISSING THE CHARGE, ON THE BASIS THAT THE MILITARY JUDGE IMPROPERLY INSTRUCTED THE MEMBERS ON THE LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSES, OTHER THAN VOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER, WHERE THE ACCUSED OBJECTED AND…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. United States v. Rodney SinclairCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. Charles R. HararyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. Sterling Keith RogersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. WaldronU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  2. United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  3. United States v. CofieldUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  4. United States v. EmmonsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  5. United States v. MiergrimadoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API