Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Houghwot

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 1936No. Appeal, 186PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This is an appeal by defendant from the refusal by the court below to grant a new trial in an action of trespass for malicious prosecution. Plaintiff, together with two others, was charged with larceny of maple sap on information made by defendant. Plaintiff was placed under arrest, handcuffed, taken to the office of the justice of the peace, and committed to jail, where he remained for five days. On the date fixed for hearing no testimony was offered by defendant, and plaintiff was discharged. Plaintiff then brought this action to recover damages for alleged malicious…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Casey v. SicilianoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Mulheirn v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Patterson v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Gates v. KeichlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adelman Et Ux. v. RosenbaumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Arye v. DicksteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. D'Allura v. PerriSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Jones v. Manhattan Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Schmidt v. CampbellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API