Legal Opinion

Gates v. Keichline

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 2, 1925No. Appeal, 120PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Mosohzisker,

In this action of ejectment, Mary G. Gates, plaintiff, recovered a verdict on which judgment was entered; defendant has appealed.

Wilson Gardner owned the farm in controversy, subject to certain mortgages and judgments; August 25, 1894, it was sold at sheriff’s sale on a fi. fa. issued upon one of the judgments, and was purchased in the name of defendant, who subsequently took title from the sheriff. Gardner died intestate May 16, 1896, and his wife, Sarah Gardner, died testate April 1, 1922, leaving her real estate to her children, including Mrs. Gates,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. KauffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Irwin v. PatchenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Kisler v. KislerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  4. Gilchrist v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Olinger v. ShultzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Casey v. SicilianoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Kern v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Moffitt v. MoffittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Watkins and Miller v. WatkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Potoczny v. DydekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API