Legal Opinion

Arye v. Dickstein

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 1940No. Appeal, 61PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Schaffer,

This is an action of trespass to recover damages for a malicious prosecution, really false imprisonment. The jury awarded plaintiff $4,000 as actual damages and $6,000 for punitive damages. The court reduced the former to $1,000 and the latter to $2,500. From the judgment entered for these sums, defendants appeal.

The facts surrounding the matter, briefly stated, are these: Plaintiff, who resided in Philadelphia and was there employed as a salesman and buyer for a business owned by his wife, desired to purchase goods from defendants, Avho were manufacturers…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Altman v. Standard Refrig. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Groda v. American Stores CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Aland v. PyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Farneth v. Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Payne v. East Liberty Spear Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Feld v. MerriamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Hughes v. BabcockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Hoffman v. Memorial Osteopathic HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Feld v. MerriamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API