Legal Opinion

D'Allura v. Perri

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1939No. Appeal, 19PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

This attachment proceeding was brought by the plaintiff who obtained a judgment against Joseph M. Perri, the defendant, summoning Millie Marchiano as garnishee, alleging that she was indebted to the defendant, an undertaker, for burying and conducting the funeral of the garnishee’s late husband. A verdict was rendered in favor of the garnishee. Motions for a new trial and judgment n. o. v. were refused. The plaintiff appealed, alleging certain trial errors which, he asserts, entitle him to a new trial.

The defendant, a relative of the deceased, admitted he helped the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. American Steel & Wire Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Peters v. Colonial Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Zimmerman v. HoughwotSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Calvey Motor Co. v. CoyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. White v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Reichman v. WallachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. FineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Brazel v. BuchananSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Commonwealth v. FineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Geesey v. Albee Pennsylvania Homes, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API