Legal Opinion

Michael v. Warner/Chilcott

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1978No. 3133PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

This is an interlocutory appeal granted defendant McKesson-Robbins, ForemostMcKesson, Skaggs Drug Centers, and third party defendant, U.S. Nuclear, Inc. These parties will be designated as defendants. The trial court denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment and defendants appeal. We affirm.

A. Facts.

Plaintiff suffered with sinus congestion symptoms since about 1952. Over the years, he took a variety of medicines as initially prescribed by physicians. Around 1965, his physician prescribed “Sinutab” in writing to be ingested four a day on a daily basis. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Love v. WolfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Toner v. Lederle LaboratoriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Klopp v. Wackenhut Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Torsiello v. Whitehall LaboratoriesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  4. Rimbert v. Eli Lilly and Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2008
  5. Nowell v. Medtronic Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API