Legal Opinion
Bercovici v. Chaplin
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 4, 1943PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
Defendant moves under Rule 39, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for an order transferring the issues relating to a motion picture entitled, “The Great Dictator”, from the jury to the nonjury calendar.
The amended complaint is in three counts and the first count is in two subdivisions. All the counts, except the second subdivision of the first count, relate in whole or in part to The Great Dictator.
The first count alleges that plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement to collaborate in the production of a series of motion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Maurel v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1915
- Maurel v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Fitzpatrick v. Sun Life Assur. Co. of CanadaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
- Ferguson v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bercovici v. ChaplinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- Tynan v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Bercovici v. ChaplinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.