Legal Opinion

Bercovici v. Chaplin

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 8, 1946No. Civ. No. 14-190PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RIFKIND, District Judge.

Although this application by plaintiff was made under Rule 16, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, it has been treated by both sides as if it were a reargument of the motion previously made by defendant to transfer the cause from the jury to the non-jury calendar. That motion was granted in part and the second and third causes of action were ordered transferred to the non-jury calendar. For the previous opinion in this case see D. C., 3 F.R.D. 409.

I have considered the second cause of action anew and have again reached the conclusion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
Bruckman v. HollzerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
Maurel v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1915
Maurel v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
Pathe Exchange, Inc. v. DalkeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Tynan v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948