Legal Opinion

Bercovici v. Chaplin

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 10, 1944PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAFFEY, District Judge.

There are two angles of approach. One will deal with the motion as an entirely; the other, with it by counts. Both aspects will be discussed.

I. If the motion be considered as an entirety, I think it must be denied. As I conceive, this is true because disposition of it otherwise would conflict with a previous ruling by Judge Rifkind. I am bound by that ruling. Commercial Union of America v. Anglo-South American Bank, 2 Cir., 10 F.2d 937, 938-940.

Judge Rifkind had before him the question of whether each of the three counts must be tried by or without a jury. In his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commercial Union of America, Inc. v. Anglo-South American Bank, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  2. Bercovici v. ChaplinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Richard W. Hostrop v. Board of Junior College District No. 515, Counties of Cook and Will and Stateof Illinois, a Body Politic and CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  2. Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Marvel Entertainment Group, Inc. v. ARP Films, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  4. Bereslavsky v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
  5. Bereslavsky v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API