Legal Opinion

Tynan v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 27, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNOX, District Judge.

Upon the assumption that this action, by virtue of the decision of the Appellate Court for this Circuit, in Arnstein v. Porter, 2 Cir., 154 F.2d 464, may properly be tried before a jury, I am of the belief that, under the circumstances here existing, I should not exercise such discretion as is given me under Rule 39(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, in order to bring this about.

In making the instant motion, plaintiff makes no offer to waive or qualify his demand that defendant account for all gains, profits and advantages derived by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Bereslavsky v. CaffeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  3. Bereslavsky v. KloebCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  4. Sheldon v. Moredall Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  5. Young v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Associated Metals, Etc., Corp. v. DIXON, CHEMICAL & RESEARCH, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  2. Lundberg v. WellesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  3. Berlin v. Club 100, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1951
  4. Boucher v. Du Boyes, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API