Legal Opinion
Phyall v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 1, 1989No. 88-1162PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HOUSTON, Justice.
Rosslyn Phyall appeals from a summary judgment entered for Allstate Insurance Company and against Ms. Phyall on her claim for uninsured motorist coverage. We affirm.
The parties stipulated the following pertinent facts for purposes of the summary judgment motion:
“1. Rosslyn Phyall and Adam Phyall, Jr., are husband and wife and are presently and have been residing in the same household.
“2. [Allstate] issued a policy of insurance to [Mr. Phyall] insuring a 1966 Chevrolet automobile....
“3. [Ms. Phyall] was injured as a proximate result of a one-car accident. She was a passenger…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reid v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Watts v. Preferred Risk Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Ex Parte O'HareSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Dale v. Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
3Cited by1 opinion
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. FeghaliSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991