Legal Opinion

Ex Parte O'Hare

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 3, 1983No. 81-715PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted certiorari to determine whether the Court of Civil Appeals was correct in its holding in the present case. That court determined that the exclusion of an "insured motor vehicle" from the definition of "uninsured motor vehicle" in the policy in question was not void and unenforceable as an attempt to restrict the uninsured motorist coverage of the Alabama Uninsured Motorist Statute. We affirm.

The facts made the basis of this suit are that on September 13, 1979, Nora O'Hare, wife of the plaintiff, James J. O'Hare, was involved in a one-car accident and sustained injuries which…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reid v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. Higgins v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  3. Aitken v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Ala. Farm Bur. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co. v. MitchellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  5. Watts v. Preferred Risk Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hooper v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Allstate Insurance Company v. HardnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Allen v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1999
  4. Shalimar Contractors, Inc. v. American States InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
  5. Dale v. Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API