Legal Opinion

Veterans' Welfare Board v. Riley

California Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1922No. S. F. No. 10161PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

The petition for a writ of 'mandamus in this case involved the validity of three statutes passed by the legislature for veterans’ welfare and aid. We ordered a writ of mandate to issue as to those items of expense involving the validity of the “California Veterans’ Welfare Act” (Stats. 1921, p. 969) and the “Veterans’ Farm and Home Purchasing Act” (Stats. 1921, p. 815), but reserved the question as to the validity of those items involved in the Veterans’ Educational Act (Stats. 1921, p. 967) for further consideration. Upon this question we asked the parties to argue certain questions…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brodhead v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Beach v. BradstreetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  3. State ex rel. Garth v. SwitzlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  4. MacMillan Co. v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. State ex rel. Hart v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1921

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lyman v. AdornoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  2. United States F. & G. Co. v. BramwellOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. California Educational Facilities Authority v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Bowker v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API