Hollis v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Accusation of fraud in uttering check. Before Judge Price. City court of Tifton. January 3, 1921.
1Opinion of the CourtEist-i, C. J.
1. Section 34 of article 20 of the act of the General Assembly entitled “ An act to regulate banking in the State of Georgia,” etc., approved August 16, 1919 (Georgia Laws 1919, pp. 135, 220), provides: “Any person who, with intent to defraud, shall make, or draw, or utter, or deliver any check, draft, or order for the payment of money upon any bank, or other depositor!', knowing at the time of such making, drawing, uttering, or de*183livery that the maker or drawer has not sufficient funds in or credit with such bank, or other depository, for the payment of such cheek, draft, or order in full…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. AverySupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Burnam v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- State v. . YarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- State v. MeeksArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- Anderson v. BrysonSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.