Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Bryson
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided December 20, 1927PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStrum, J.
Plaintiff in Error, as plaintiff below, sued the defendant in error to recover damages for malicious prosecution. The trial resulted in a directed verdict and judgment for the defendant, to review which judgment this writ of error is taken.
This action grew out of a former prosecution of the plaintiff Anderson by the defendant Bryson before a Justice of the Peace of Hillsborough County in which the plaintiff Anderson was charged with having committed the offense of issuing a worthless check in violation of Chapter 9328, Laws of 1923, which prosecution resulted in a discharge of the plaintiff…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Wheeler v. NesbittSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Tatum Bros. Real Estate & Investment Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- State v. AverySupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Stubbs v. MulhollandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Barnett v. K-Mart (In Re Barnett)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1981
- Liabos v. HarmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Cold v. ClarkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Ennis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Cook v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.