Legal Opinion

State v. Meeks

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1926No. Criminal No. 637PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, C. J.

On the fourth day of August, 1925, the county attorney of Maricopa county filed an information against Fred L. Meeks charging in proper form that on the third day of December, 1924, he, with the intent to defraud, feloniously drew, uttered and delivered to Jim Pendergast,- in payment of a debt due the latter since the fifteenth day of O'c tober, 1924, a check on the Citizens’ State Bank of Phoenix for $17.30, knowing at the time that he did not have sufficient funds in or credit with the bank to meet the check when it should be presented for payment.

To this information the defendant demurred…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. AverySupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  2. Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. State v. LowensteinOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  4. United States v. PlylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. People v. KhanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. BradleyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Commonwealth v. MutnikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. State v. CloughCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Colin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. State v. HinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API