Legal Opinion
Getz v. Progressive Specialty Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 14, 2001No. 46413-2-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
22 P.3d 835 (2001)
106 Wash.App. 184
Harry and Carol GETZ, Appellants,
v.
PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
No. 46413-2-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
May 14, 2001.
Jonathan David Sweigert, Polito & Sweigert, PLLC, Bellevue, for Appellants.
Jerret E. Sale, Bullivant Houser Bailey, Seattle, for Respondent.
ELLINGTON, J.
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company issued an auto policy to Harry Getz. The policy contains definitions of several terms, which sometimes appear printed entirely in capital letters. Progressive argues that the policy definitions apply only where the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Lessee of Ewing v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Kitsap County v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. SkinAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Nelson v. Mutual of EnumclawCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Dep Of Sls, Calvin Turner v. DshsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Gonzales v. Director Nevada Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
- Nelson v. Mutual of EnumclawCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.