Legal Opinion

Luttinger v. Rosen

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 1, 1972PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.

The plaintiffs contracted to purchase for $85,000 premises in the city of Stamford owned by the defendants and paid a deposit of $8500. The contract was “subject to and conditional upon the buyers obtaining first mortgage financing on said premises from a bank or other lending institution in an amount of $45,000 for a term of not less than twenty (20) years and at an interest rate which does not exceed 8-% per cent per annum.” The plaintiffs agreed to use due diligence in attempting to obtain such financing. The parties further agreed that if the plaintiffs were unsuccessful in obtaining…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brauer v. FrecciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  2. Lach v. CahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  3. Tracy v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  4. Vachon v. TomascakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  5. Janulewycz v. QuaglianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Simses v. North American Co. for Life & Health InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  2. Phillipe v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. Pullman, Comley, Bradley & Reeves v. Tuck-it-away, Bridgeport, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  4. North v. NorthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Barber v. JacobsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API