Legal Opinion
Pullman, Comley, Bradley & Reeves v. Tuck-it-away, Bridgeport, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 4, 1992No. 10649PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
In this interpleader action,1 the defendant, Vestpro Corporation, appeals from the judg*461ment of the trial court awarding the other defendant, Tuck-it-away, Bridgeport, Inc., $100,000 as liquidated damages for Vestpro’s default under the terms of a contract for the sale of real property.2 Vestpro claims that the trial court improperly found that Tuck-it-away was entitled to the $100,000 as liquidated damages for Vest-pro’s default in performance of the contract of sale. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The parties stipulated to the following facts. On or about April 13,1988,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Lach v. CahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Martin v. KavanewskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Ravitch v. Stollman Poultry Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Christophersen v. BlountSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Polverari v. PeattConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. GalloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Fruin v. Colonnade One at Old Greenwich Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Nielsen v. WisniewskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Seligson v. BrowerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.