Legal Opinion
Phillipe v. Thomas
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 2, 1985No. 2097PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
This is an appeal1 from the judgment of the trial court for the plaintiff, entitling her to the return of a deposit paid to the defendant under an agreement to purchase real estate. We find error.
On April 13,1979, the parties entered into the agreement for the sale of certain real estate from the defendant to the plaintiff for $105,000. The agreement *472contained a mortgage contingency clause conditioning the plaintiffs obligation on her obtaining a commitment for a thirty-year, $84,000 first mortgage at prevailing interest rates, and on such other terms and conditions imposed at the time by any…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Scribner v. O'Brien, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Lach v. CahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Kakalik v. BernardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Stabile v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In re Rayna M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Lynch v. AndrewMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Snow v. Western Savings & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- In re Eden F.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Aubin v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.