Legal Opinion
Exxon Corp. v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 21, 1989No. 86 Civ. 9445 (WCC)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Exxon Corporation (“Exxon”) moves for reconsideration of the Court’s Opinion and Order, dated March 3, 1989, dismissing its claim for a maritime lien, under the Federal Maritime Lien Act (the “Act”), 1 for want of admiralty jurisdiction. See Exxon Corporation v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc., 707 F.Supp. 155 (S.D.N.Y.1989).
I have carefully considered “the matters [and] controlling decisions” which Exxon “believes the court has overlooked,” Local Rule 3(j); accord Ruiz v. The Commissioner of the Department of Transportation of the City of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Contemporary Mission, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, Angelo J. Gaetano, Richard P. Evans, John Does I, Ii, and IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Ingersoll Milling Machine Co. v. M/V BodenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Richard W. Neely v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company and Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- The Emily SouderSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Minturn v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shipping Financial Services Corporation v. William J. Drakos, Duke Petroleum Transport Corporation and Omi Petrolink CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Exxon Corp. v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mouawad National Co. v. Lazare Kaplan International Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Exxon Corp. v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Fernandez v. HaynieDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000