Legal Opinion
Richard W. Neely v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company and Standard Oil Company of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 19, 1978No. 77-2712PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PALMIERI, District Judge:
In 1976 three natural-gas-powered engines used for irrigation purposes on farms owned and operated by appellant Neely became inoperable due to damage caused by contaminated lubricating oil. The oil used in these engines was purchased exclusively from appellee Standard Oil Company of California (Standard Oil). At the time an insurance policy issued to Neely by appellee St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (St. Paul) provided coverage for damage to the engines caused by vandalism. Both appellees are foreign corporations lawfully doing business in Arizona.
Neely…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Clifton Redman v. County of San Diego Capt. Richard Beall Lt. Robert Witcraft Sgt. Dan Canfield Deputy Gene Turner, and Does I Through Xx, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Kaiser Cement Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Fischbach and Moore, Inc., the Howard P. Foley Co., a District of Columbia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- City of Pomona v. Sqm North America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Madsen v. ErwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.