The Emily Souder
Supreme Court of the United States
Appeals from the Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York: The firm of Packenham Beatty & Co., and also a certain Pritchard, filed sepai’ate libels in the District Court of the district just mentioned, against the steamer Emily Souder,. an American vessel, owned in New York.
Read the full summary
Appeals from the Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York: The firm of Packenham Beatty & Co., and also a certain Pritchard, filed sepai’ate libels in the District Court of the district just mentioned, against the steamer Emily Souder,. an American vessel, owned in New York. The case was thus: The steamer while on a voyage to that port from Rio Janeiro in June, 1865, lost her screw, and was compelled to put into the port of Maranham, on the coast of Brazil, for repairs. Her captain was without funds, sufficient to meet the expenses for these repairs, and other expenses incurred and…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Field
The rule announced in The Grapeshot, * and there relieved from the supposed embarrassment of some previous decisions of this Court, and repeated and affirmed in The Lulu, † and The Kalorama, ‡ and followed in The Patapsco, § disposes of the main question in these cases. The steamer here had entered; the port of Maranham, on-the coast of Brazil,-in distress; she had lost her propelling screw, and was towud into port by another steamer, for which she had signalled. ’The repairs there made to the vessel, and the supplies furnished to her, and the expenses incurred on- her account, were necessary…
2Cited by71 opinions
- Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- The GlideSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The KateSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. Mayflower Gold Mining & Reduction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- The IrisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.