Legal Opinion
Mompoint v. Lotus Development Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 16, 1986No. Civ. A. No. 85-1664-NPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINAL ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE . ORDER, ETC. (#20)
ROBERT B. COLLINGS, United States Magistrate.
The defendant Lotus Development Corporation (hereinafter, Lotus) seeks a protective order which contains the following clause:
Neither the plaintiff nor his attorneys of record shall interview any Lotus employees regarding any matter pertinent to this litigation other than pursuant to Rule 30 or as otherwise agreed by the parties.
The plaintiff opposes the entry of such an order.
A brief review of the issues in the case is in order. The plaintiff’s Complaint alleges that he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- International Business Machines Corp. v. EdelsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Rodriguez v. PercellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Vega v. BloomsburghDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1977
- United States v. City of MilwaukeeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1975
3Cited by23 opinions
- Amarin Plastics, Inc. v. Maryland Cup Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987
- Chancellor v. Boeing Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1988
- Curley v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- Hanntz v. Shiley, Inc. a Div. of Pfizer, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- University Patents, Inc. v. KligmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.