Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Treppschuh
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided October 16, 1975No. Patent Appeal No. 74-570PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
This appeal is from that part of the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences, which involves appellant Hunt’s continuation-in-part1 of an earlier filed parent application2 and the patent 3 of appellees Treppschuh et al., awarding priority of invention with respect to count 7 to the patentees.4 The sole question is whether count 7 is supported in Hunt’s parent application, which is relied on as a constructive reduction to practice. The answer depends on whether the parent application includes a disclosure of an embodiment within the count that meets the requirements of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Hedgewick v. AkersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Charles B. Swain and Albert G. Schuessler v. Bob C. CrittendonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Snitzer v. EtzelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Homer I. Henderson v. Donovan B. GrableCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Falko-Gunter Falkner, Georg Holzer, and Friedrich Dorner v. Stephen C. Inglis, Michael E.G. Boursnell, and Anthony C. MinsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Ilco Corp. v. Ideal Security Hardware Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Squires v. CorbettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- In re McKellinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Weil v. FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.