Legal Opinion
Homer I. Henderson v. Donovan B. Grable
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided March 4, 1965No. Patent Appeal 7236PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
This is an appeal from the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of invention in Intei'ferenee No. 91,037 to Grable, the Senior party.
The issue for determination is whether Henderson is entitled to the date of his parent application for “Well Drilling Device and Method”, serial No. 284,-739 filed April 28, 1952. The answer hinges on the sufficiency of the Henderson parent application to support two limitations of the first count in interference.
Grable is involved in the proceedings on the basis of his patent 2,850,264, titled “Dual Passage Concentric Pipe Drill String…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- George E. Hall, Jr. v. Louis B. TaylorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- In Re DraegerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
- Application of Oliver Kenneth KelleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Walter H. Wirkler v. Corles M. Perkins and Alfred BennettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Cusano v. DecepoliCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
3Cited by12 opinions
- Reese v. HurstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Robert C. Woofter v. Vernon E. CarlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Samuel P. McCutchen Jr., and Jack E. Eskilson v. Francis A. OliverCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Hunt v. TreppschuhCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- In re HotteCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.