Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Cline

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1888PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Wayne. (Speed, J.) Bill for specific performance'. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The bill in this cause is filed for the specific-performance of an alleged contract to sell land. The premises in controversy are described as lo.s 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 of outlot No. 193, Rivard farm, Detroit, Wayne county, Mich.

The contract sought to he enforced reads as follows:

“I will sell lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 of outlot 193, Rivard farm, Detroit, Wayne Co., Mich., for $17,500, payable $8,000 cash; bal, $2,500 per annum, with interest annually from April 1, 1887, at 5 per cent. Upon payment of pm *519rata amount, lots to be released from mortgage for purchase money.
“Payments…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Brenner v. DuncanMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Kutsche v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Frank v. Stratford-HandcockWyoming Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Jones v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  5. Ellis's Admr. v. DurkeeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1906

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API