Jurgensen v. Morris
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Gustav A. Jurgensen, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 7th day of May, 1920, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Kings County Special Term.
1Opinion of the Court
Mills, J.:
This action was brought to secure the specific performance of a contract of sale, to which the plaintiff claimed to be *93entitled by virtue of a written agreement or option to purchase the said property contained in the lease thereof to plaintiff by the defendants.
There is really no dispute about the material facts. The lease in question to the plaintiff contained the following clause: “ And the said parties of the first part agree that in the event of their desire to sell the above mentioned property, before the expiration of this lease, that the party of the second part shall have…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Saperstein v. Mechanics & Farmers Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Bullock v. CuttingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
3Cited by21 opinions
- Brenner v. DuncanMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- King v. Dalton Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Barling v. HornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Superior Portland Cement, Inc. v. Pacific Coast Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
- Cortese v. ConnorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.