Hartford Accident Indemnity Company v. Cosby
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff rendered in what is commonly called an “excess judgment suit.” The plaintiff below, who is the appellee here, was insured by the appellant, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, for liability resulting from accidents. The amount of the policy was $25,000. The policy provided that the insurer would defend any suit against the insured seeking damages caused by accident, but that “the company may make such investigation, and settlement of any claim or suit as it deems expedient.”
The complaint in the present suit contains…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Brassil v. . Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Waters v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, PaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Attleboro Mfg. Co. v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass Ins.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1917
- Zumwalt v. Utilities InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Linkenhoger v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1953
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Toy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Elba Wood Products, Inc. v. BrackinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. FosterMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Highlands Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Elegante Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1996
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.