Legal Opinion

Zumwalt v. Utilities Insurance

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 13, 1950No. 41732PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTipton, J.

In the circuit court of the city of St. Louis the plaintiffs filed this action on the grounds of defendant’s bad faith and negligence in failing to settle the law suit styled Burneson v. Zumwalt Company within the limits of a $10,000 policy of liability insurance issued by defendant. The plaintiffs also sought to recover attorney’s fee and penalties for vexatious delay and punitive damages. The plaintiffs recovered $7,012.77 actual damages, which' was the amount and interest they had to pay of the judgment in the Burneson case after it was affirmed by this court. Our opinion is reported in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tyger River Pine Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  2. Johnson v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  3. Bartlett v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Rumford Falls Paper Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899
  5. Boling v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Toy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Overcast v. Billings Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  3. Truck Insurance Exchange v. Prairie Framing, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Tyler v. Grange Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Crull v. GlebMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API